Norwalk High School
350 Shady Ln Dr
Norwalk OH, 44857, Huron County
Phone: 419-668-2079
Ranking: (432 out of 821, bottom 47%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Norwalk City School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 46 | 45 | 44 | |||||||
Total Students: | 741 | 814 | 824 | 862 | 820 | 868 | 865 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 239 | 32.3% | 242 | 29.7% | 259 | 31.4% | 292 | 33.9% | 313 | 38.2% | 314 | 36.2% | 269 | 31.1% |
Grade 10: | 212 | 28.6% | 216 | 26.5% | 220 | 26.7% | 245 | 28.4% | 231 | 28.2% | 202 | 23.3% | 198 | 22.9% |
Grade 11: | 143 | 19.3% | 173 | 21.3% | 185 | 22.5% | 179 | 20.8% | 155 | 18.9% | 177 | 20.4% | 202 | 23.4% |
Grade 12: | 147 | 19.8% | 183 | 22.5% | 160 | 19.4% | 146 | 16.9% | 121 | 14.8% | 174 | 20.0% | 196 | 22.7% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 383 | 51.7% | 413 | 50.7% | 421 | 51.1% | 452 | 52.4% | 424 | 51.7% | 440 | 50.7% | 431 | 49.8% |
Female: | 358 | 48.3% | 401 | 49.3% | 403 | 48.9% | 410 | 47.6% | 378 | 46.1% | 411 | 47.4% | 426 | 49.2% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 2 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Asian: | 5 | 0.7% | 6 | 0.7% | 6 | 0.7% | 6 | 0.7% | 3 | 0.4% | 1 | 0.1% | 2 | 0.2% |
Hispanic: | 49 | 6.6% | 51 | 6.3% | 47 | 5.7% | 48 | 5.6% | 48 | 5.9% | 48 | 5.5% | 50 | 5.8% |
Black: | 15 | 2.0% | 20 | 2.5% | 16 | 1.9% | 33 | 3.8% | 31 | 3.8% | 41 | 4.7% | 43 | 5.0% |
White: | 648 | 87.4% | 718 | 88.2% | 729 | 88.5% | 755 | 87.6% | 726 | 88.5% | 769 | 88.6% | 766 | 88.6% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 22 | 3.0% | 19 | 2.3% | 25 | 3.0% | 19 | 2.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 243 | 32.8% | 272 | 33.4% | 299 | 36.3% | 285 | 33.1% | 281 | 34.3% | 228 | 26.3% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 68 | 9.2% | 70 | 8.6% | 82 | 10.0% | 76 | 8.8% | 79 | 9.6% | 73 | 8.4% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 19.00 | 20.35 | 19.96 | 20.52 | 17.83 | 19.30 | 19.80 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 66.7% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 82.4% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 84.8% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 89.4% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.1% | 78.1% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 84.2% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 85.9% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.3% | 87.3% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.3% | 89.3% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.7% | 90.7% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.7% | 76.7% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 92.3% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.6% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 85.8% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.9% | 81.9% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.8% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.1% | 87.1% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 71.4% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 73.4% | 73.4% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 80.8% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.2% | 74.2% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.2% | 80.2% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.6% | 76.6% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 81.5% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.0% | 83.0% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.5% | 81.5% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.7% | 79.7% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.9% | 78.9% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.2% | 83.2% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.7% | 78.7% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.1% | 82.1% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.1% | 83.1% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 84.9% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 84.3% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 82.9% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.7% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 94.4% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.6% | 87.6% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85% | 85% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 91.1% | 91.1% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 84.3% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.5% | 91.5% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.2% | 95.2% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.4% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.7% | 96.7% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 93.8% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 94.1% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.6% | 95.6% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.6% | 93.6% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.1% | 96.1% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 95.3% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.1% | 97.1% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.6% | 89.6% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 90.4% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 85.1% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 86% | 86% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.8% | 91.8% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.6% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.5% | 90.5% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 91% | 91% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.4% | 91.4% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.2% | 93.2% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.7% | 95.7% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.8% | 94.8% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 94.7% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 94.5% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.2% | 94.2% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 94.7% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 95.3% | 95.3% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 97.6% | 97.6% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Norwalk High School was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.